2 Comments
Jan 14, 2022·edited Jan 14, 2022

The FLCCC group (Kory) you cite had their protocol MATH+ study (later I-MASK+) which includes ivermectin was withdrawn from the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine due to incorrect numbers/faulty math (no pun intended). A second IVM meta-analysis/systematic review they published (your reference) was also refuted this week in the same journal in which it was published. That review contained individual IVM studies with fraud, plagiarism, lack of blinding, allocation bias, impossible data points, lack of registration or study guideline (STROBE/CONSORT) adherence, use of active controls, unequal covariates [risks], unequal treatments, failed or improper randomization, and absent or incorrect statistics. https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2022/02000/Meta_Analyses_Do_Not_Establish_Improved_Mortality.11.aspx

Expand full comment

That stuff doesn’t really matter since Ivermectin has been proven to work in the real world scenarios. My wife and I and many of our family and friends have all used it to successfully recover from covid in 4 days or less with no side effects. We’ve also heard and read of 100’s of stories of success. Furthermore, what is the argument for NOT using it? It is safe and does no harm so why not?

Expand full comment