NIH Study Finds Ivermectin Reduces Infections, Serious Disease, and Deaths from Covid
NIH Study Finds Ivermectin Reduces Infections, Serious Disease, and Deaths from Covid
Ivermectin does everything the vaccines don't
Fauci’s NIH knew Ivermectin killed Covid all along. At least since April 22, 2021.
Got an email tonight from Tea Party legend Brian Bollman, inventor of the Rolling Tea Party Tactic that took the world by storm in 2010. He was adding some deep science to this earlier Hennessy’s View post:
Brian’s find: an NIH study found Ivermectin was the silver bullet against Covid:
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. 1
Got that? Reduced deaths, shorter time to recovery from symptoms, and shorter time to negative Covid tests. All from Ivermectin.
But there’s more.
Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. 2
Ivermectin is like Shimmer, the floor wax and dessert topping. It prevents Covid and cures it. Both in individuals and in entire countries that distribute it widely.
Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified. 3
Ivermectin is the silver bullet, folks. But doctors, hospitals, and public health “experts” prevented or discouraged Americans from using it. They should all be in jail—or worse. They killed people for profit.
Here’s the full report: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
Kory, P., Meduri, G. U., Varon, J., Iglesias, J., & Marik, P. E. (2021). Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. American journal of therapeutics, 28(3), e299–e318. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001377
ibid.
ibid.
The FLCCC group (Kory) you cite had their protocol MATH+ study (later I-MASK+) which includes ivermectin was withdrawn from the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine due to incorrect numbers/faulty math (no pun intended). A second IVM meta-analysis/systematic review they published (your reference) was also refuted this week in the same journal in which it was published. That review contained individual IVM studies with fraud, plagiarism, lack of blinding, allocation bias, impossible data points, lack of registration or study guideline (STROBE/CONSORT) adherence, use of active controls, unequal covariates [risks], unequal treatments, failed or improper randomization, and absent or incorrect statistics. https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2022/02000/Meta_Analyses_Do_Not_Establish_Improved_Mortality.11.aspx