

Discover more from Hennessy's View
I was the last Traditional Catholic to realize the man occupying the Seat of Peter is not one to obey.
Previously, I had been one of the many conservative Catholic “Popesplainers.” Popesplainers are Catholics who find some tortured logic to align Bergoglio’s many heresies and apostasies with traditional Church teaching. I became a Popesplainer after he changed the Catechism of the Catholic Church to make capital punishment “inadmissible,” whatever that means. I even bought into the various Catholic Answers excuses for Amoris Laetitia and Laudate Si, even those their excuses were so tortured I can’t remember what they were.
Doesn’t matter. They were lies. Lies we told ourselves in order to square our traditional submission to the authority of the Church and the Bishop of Rome with Bergoglio’s flat rejection of the teaching of Jesus Christ and His apostles.
It was in October, 2019, that I finally had to admit Bergoglio could not be obeyed. He was no longer pope under the theory of St. Robert Bellermine, as quoted in a 2020 article by Bishop Athanasius Schneider:
St. Robert Bellarmine’s opinion is that “a pope who is a manifest heretic, ceases in himself to be Pope and head, just as he ceases in himself to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church: whereby, he can be judged and punished by the Church” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30).
In October 2019, Bergoglio (aka, Francis) introduced pagan idols, first to the lawn of the Vatican, where they were venerated and worshipped, then onto the altar of St. Peter’s Basilica. The latter apostasy seemed the act of an obstinate and defiant personality, a “oh, yeah,” to the bishops and priests who objected to devil worship at the Vatican.
A noble Catholic from Austria, then, traveled to Rome, removed the pagan idols from a Vatican church, and threw them into the Tiber River, whereupon Bergoglio summoned the Rome police to reportedly fish them out and, again, venerate the demons in Vatican churches.
Bergoglio’s week-long display of hatred of God Almighty convinced me that he is either emotionally unfit for any position of authority, possessed, an enemy of the Church of Jesus Christ, or all three. My shock and confusion was so great I pondered the event over a month before publishing this examination:
(Pandemonium literally means “all the demons” or “all the demonic.”)
I waited because I had to prayerfully consider, not only whether to publish my concerns, but whether I should think such thoughts at all. In the end, my prayerful meditation convinced me that I not only should publish, I must publish. I must warn others that following Bergoglio might lead them straight to the gates of hell.
Little did I know on November 3, 2019, that a bioweapons research lab in Wuhan, China, was shut down that very day for reason that only later became clear: a man-mutated virus had escaped, either accidentally or by design.
Nor did I know when I hit publish that in Akita, Japan, an elderly nun who had received multiple visitations from the Holy Mother in 1973, in the wake of Roe v. Wade, received another brief visit from the Mother of God on the very day the supposed pope was venerating demons on the Vatican lawn!
Our Lady told Sr. Agnes, “Put on ashes and pray for a repentant rosary every day.”
I wrote about these three coinciding events on the third anniversary of the apostasy:
I stand by everything I have written on the subject, and I have received absolutely no evidence that I erred.
But, now, an even greater threat to the Church and to humanity looms on the ominous horizon: the Synod on Synodality scheduled for October 2024. I cannot find exact dates, but October 4, 5, or 6 seem consistent. October 7 is the Feast of Our Lady of Victory—the day the power of the Rosary destroyed an advancing Mohammedan that threatened to end Christendom in 1571. I have written of this miraculous victory before, all the way back in 2008, before most of you even heard of me:
and, again in 2018:
Thus, the first week of October seems to be a time of historical battles between demons and angels, evil and good, Satan and God. Evil lifts its ugly head, Our Lady appears to give us instructions, and, if we follow her lead, evil is defeated.
But what if we don’t follow her lead? What if we are too busy or too scared or too satisfied or too distracted? She told the waiters at Cana to “do whatever He tells you,'“ and those waiters obeyed Christ’s order to fill the pots with water. They filled them to rim and the wedding was saved. (Yes, running out of booze at a wedding is an act of unmitigated evil.) Would the wedding have been saved if the waiters disobeyed?
Mary’s only command in the Bible was a command to all, for “From this day all generations will call me blessed.” (Luke 1:48) She told Sr. Agnes to put on ashes and pray a Rosary in repentance every day. She knew the plague was coming. How fervently must we pray now?
IN the Church, we are taught that any teaching by the pope ex cathedra is infallible. Even Bishop Schneider wrote in that 2020 article that such is impossible: “The pope as pope cannot fall into formal heresy in the sense that he would pronounce a heresy ex cathedra.”
The pope as pope cannot fall into formal heresy in the sense that he would pronounce a heresy ex cathedra.
Cardinals and bishops close to Bergoglio are telling us that he is preparing make changes to Catholic doctrine that “are irreversible.” Put the two together, and what do you have?
What if the pope were to pronounce heresy, even apostasy, as the infallable word of God? What would happen if Bergoglio attempted to make one or more of his many heresies Church dogma?
There is no other way his Synod on Synodality can make “irreversible” changes to the Church. Anything short of an ex cathedra teaching can be reversed, just as Bergoglio himself reversed Pope Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum regarding the universal permission for the Latin Mass. Only dogma cannot be altered by a future pope or council.
What else could Bergoglio’s minions mean when they say he will make his changes irreversible? What would be the consequences for the Church? How would it survive?
Jesus Christ guaranteed that the gates of hell would not prevail against His Church, but He did not tell us in what manner it might survive such a blatant assault by an heir of Peter.
The only answer, logically, is that Bergoglio was either never pope, by invalid election, or he ceased to be pope by formal heresy at some point prior to such a pronouncement.
I, admit, I do not know that Bergoglio will attampt to make heresy into dogma, but I can find no other way to square the prideful assurances of “irreversibility” from his Renfields with what the Church has always taught regarding the Deposit of Faith.
All I can say is, beware an October surprise the likes of which the world had never seen? Beware the days leading up to Our Lady of Victory on October 7 and the days following.
And, most of all, take heed of Our Lady’s repeated admonitions to “pray the Rosary every day.” Be like the waiters of Cana and do what your mother tells you.
What's With October?
Oh, and how about his choices for Cardinal now!!!!! WAY OUT thinkers and therefore REAL TROUBLE for the ONE TRUE CHURCH!! GOD HELP US IN THE UPCOMING YEAR!! Frankie is TOTALLY EVIL AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN!!
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for the TOTALLY AWESOME AND RELEVANT POST!! I'VE THOUGHT THE SAME EXACT THING ABOUT THE PACHAMAMA SINCE HE DESECRATED THE ALTAR OF ST. PETER'S TWO YEARS AGO!! BERGOLIO IS, IN MY ESTIMATION, A REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN!! The last TRUE Pope was Pope Benedick XVI!! We are a ruderliss church now!! Look at the so-called "leaders" in the church today!! ALL RADICAL followers of Bergolio and his ilk!!