How Emphasis on Race Hurts Efforts to Reform Municipal Courts

My story on the Justice Department’s Ferguson report addressed race early. .

So let’s have a little blunt talk about race from a West County white guy’s point of view (which is alway helpful).

Faction A and Faction B

Whenever race comes up, two large factions shut down. They shut down intellectually because ‘race’ touches an irrational, emotional nerve.

Faction A views every issue as a race problem. They see rain at a picnic as racist. They see horse racing as racist. They see the neighbor’s barking dog as racism, even if the dog and its owner are black. Doesn’t matter. Anything that bothers them must have racism as its cause. This group assumed Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown because Michael Brown is black, and no evidence in the world will change their minds.

Faction B views every problem as a false accusation of racism. If Faction B sees a KKK member burning a cross, it  blame the race-mongers for putting Section 8 housing where some gentleman needed to start a fire. This group believes every time a police officer shoots someone, arrests someone, or pulls over someone, the police action was justified and necessary. No. Matter. What. This tweet, in response to yesterday’s headline, is a perfect example of Faction B reaction:

As soon as either faction hears “race,” it exits the conversation. They leave the conversation because the word triggers a default script in their minds. Everything to them is literally black or white.

And these are two really big factions. Both factions are so big that united they can do anything and divided they can stop everything.

If we hope to resolve the problems of police and courts shaking down citizens, we must unite these two factions. But declaring any problem a racial problem divides these two factions.

So what’s the solution?

I don’t have the full answer, but I know it starts with leadership, because all problems are leadership problems.

Leaders must rise above the race card. That’s not to say leaders ignore racial problems. It means leaders accept the racial factors involve, then address the causes of the problem.

Let’s use Ferguson as an example.

Race and Ferguson

I recognize that race is a factor in Ferguson, and I said as much in yesterday’s post. But gazing at the race problem does nothing but satisfy Faction A (“I told you so”) and irritating the Faction B (“There they go again.”) Real leaders must acknowledge the obvious: abusive courts and fine-wielding police in Ferguson disproportionally hurt African-Americans.

And that’s where the racial conversation must end.

Blaming Ferguson’s problems on race is like blaming a cavity on tooth decay. The decay is the thing you can see, but the cavity didn’t cause itself. Bad hygiene and diet and maybe a little genetics caused the problem. While drilling and filling the cavity will stop the pain, the next tooth over will soon rot.

In Ferguson, the problem is government. The people in government who created the problem did not decide “let’s mess with the black people.” They decided, “let’s use the police and courts to pull in more money.” Black people disproportionately got in the way of that money grab. The money grab, not racism, caused distrust of the police and courts. Since the police and courts are mostly white and the people mostly black, race was a factor in the result, not necessarily in the cause.

Put another way, there is no racial remedy for what’s wrong in Ferguson, but fixing Ferguson will disproportionately benefit African-Americans. And that’s a good thing.

Seize the Blessing | Ignore the Curse

Leaders must want to fix the problem, not be proven right about its cause. Addressing the real problem of overextended municipal government and unprincipled leaders like Judge Ronald Brockmeyer will alleviate the  most obvious race problem of poor blacks going to jail and getting poorer.

The Justice Department’s report on Ferguson was both a blessing and a curse. The blessing was pointing out how corrupt and destructive is the practice of “taxation by citation,” to use Senator Eric Schmitt’s fantastic phrase. The curse of the DOJ report was its over-emphasis on race as a cause.

If our leaders focus on the blessing in the DOJ report, we can unite the factions and do anything that needs to be done. Unity will improve the race problem. But admiring the problem does nothing.


Author: William Hennessy

Co-founder of St. Louis Tea Party Coalition and Nationwide Chicago Tea Party Persuasive design expertLatest book: Turning On Trump: An Evolution (2016)Author of The Conservative Manifest (1993), Zen Conservatism (2009), Weaving the Roots (2011), and Fight to Evolve (2016)I believe every person deserves the dignity of meaningful work as the only path to human flourishing.

7 Comments on “How Emphasis on Race Hurts Efforts to Reform Municipal Courts

  1. Thanks Bill,
    If anyone wants to see a court case from RIGHT BEFORE Ferguson, where Brockmeyer wholesale violates constitutional rights, and the court file gets an “F – ” grade, and there is proof that Brockmeyer does this will malicious intent. I have a copy of my court file from Breckenridge….you know the other super corrupt court…same judge…same corrupt leadership…different side of I70

    In my filings, I point out many things..including widespread violations of the constitution and state law.
    We can sit down and find at least 100 grievous violations of Missouri and US law and Constitution from my court file.

    Would you believe the court mailed me documents which are not in the court file…
    Would you believe his court clerks do not even date stamp the documents they put in the file.

    The ONLY fix is to shut down the Muni courts, and have an independent court with full time judges who have NO relationship with the Puny Muni’s, who will dismiss all tickets they perceive are revenue tickets. Which means a court that practices law, not “lets abuse the citizens then pick their pocket”

    1. Thanks, Dan.

      Did you see that Judge Brockmeyer resigned as Ferguson’s judge and as Dellwood’s prosecutor?

      And the Missouri Supreme Court has reassigned all cases to a superior court?

      That’s a big win in my book.

      Thank you for sticking to this for so long. Great work for justice.

  2. Bill, thanks for highlighting and talking about the abuse by the municipalities in NoCounty to raise funds to support their municipalities on the back of mostly poor black people. I urge you to read the article in today’s STL Post Dispatch. I have been following this saga since before the M Brown shooting after reading and hearing about the efforts by Arch City Defenders, a group of professors from St.Louis University Law School. The DOJ report contains devastating information and complaining about racism, like you say is not going to fix anything. I appreciate the comments from someone else in response to another one of your posts that thinks if you do nothing wrong then you should not have to worry about getting tickets. How would he like to get a ticket for saying his name is Mike instead of Michael or getting a ticket for improper walking. And then we read about the City Attorney for Pine Lawn, who serves as prosecutor in some municipalities and as municipal judge in others and at the same time is one of the attorneys for the Brown family. I agree with the Post’s recommendation that the Missouri Supreme Court should do what Arch City Defenders recommended last year: Appoint a special master not just to study, but begin the dismantling of all municipal courts in St.Louis County. It is something we should all get behind and support.

    1. Thank you, Frieda.

      Yes, the Arch City Defenders do fantastic work in fighting abusive municipal court practices.

      And I agree with your prescription–to adopt Arch City Defenders’ recommendation.

      You know, when we agree with Post-Dispatch, we’re onto something!

Comments are closed.